myuname
06-25 11:58 AM
Can I use AC21 portability to move to another employer C or better yet use it to transfer 485 to current employer B using my EAD?
Any Insight? Thanks,
Any Insight? Thanks,
wallpaper exercise Shark Tank 2011.
shiniboy
07-07 05:14 AM
Thank you, I love your site.
vallabhu
04-10 09:34 PM
Bump
2011 Local on quot;Shark Tankquot;. Posted:
InTheMoment
06-18 07:57 PM
2 (a) is only if you have an approved I-140. In your case write "Concurrent filing of I-140/I-485 based on NIW"
more...
nhfirefighter13
December 19th, 2004, 04:39 PM
I've been seeing all these High Key/ desaturated photoshop alterations on portraits so I figured I'd give it a shot... Comments?
gc_perm2k6
10-16 08:00 PM
We filed two different I485s. One me as Primary, for which I have not received any receipt which reached on July 17th. Another from my husbands employer, me as beneficiary which reached on Aug 13th. We got receipt and FP Notice for one which was applied through my husband's employer. Confusion is that in my receipt notice the Alien Number is different from what I received on my I140 Approval Notice. Is it of any concern? Finally will my husband be able to get EAD from my application?
Appreciate any views or opinions!
Thanks A Lot!
Appreciate any views or opinions!
Thanks A Lot!
more...
freddyCR
March 2nd, 2005, 08:38 PM
Not very sure about this one...what do you think?
http://www.dphoto.us/forumphotos/data/500/medium/stray1-1_BW8x6L.jpg
http://www.dphoto.us/forumphotos/data/500/medium/stray1-1_BW8x6L.jpg
2010 ABC#39;s quot;Shark Tankquot; - and
realizeit
08-12 02:08 PM
H-1B Willful Violator List of Employers
http://www.dol.gov/esa/whd/immigration/H1BWillfulViolator.htm
H-1B Debarred/Disqualified List of Employers
http://www.dol.gov/esa/whd/immigration/H1BDebarment.htm
H-1B Program Related General Link Available at DOL site:
http://www.dol.gov/esa/whd/immigration/h1b.htm
Department of Labor - Employment and Training Administration - Office of Foreign Labor Certification - Program Debarments
http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/pdf/Debartment_List_Revisions.pdf
http://www.dol.gov/esa/whd/immigration/H1BWillfulViolator.htm
H-1B Debarred/Disqualified List of Employers
http://www.dol.gov/esa/whd/immigration/H1BDebarment.htm
H-1B Program Related General Link Available at DOL site:
http://www.dol.gov/esa/whd/immigration/h1b.htm
Department of Labor - Employment and Training Administration - Office of Foreign Labor Certification - Program Debarments
http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/pdf/Debartment_List_Revisions.pdf
more...
Blog Feeds
05-25 03:10 AM
Indian-born Karan Kler is the executive director of the Coachella Valley Immigration Service and Assistance Inc., a nonprofit immigration counseling agency in Palm Springs, California. My friend Dan Kowalski forwarded me a really nice article on Karan's journey from an influential business and military family in India to heading a non-profit agency assisting immigrants in need.
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/05/immigrant-of-the-day-karan-kler-immigrant-advocate.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/05/immigrant-of-the-day-karan-kler-immigrant-advocate.html)
hair The Shark Tank
Templarian
03-10 01:19 AM
http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/5856/guessi.png
more...
stuckinmuck
03-04 05:52 PM
Hello friends,
Here's a word of caution for you. Anti-H1Bs are slicing and dicing this very conversation and presenting it as a scam.
Please make sure while opening/answering these threads that you do not inadvertently reflect on IV as supporting illegal actions.
http://seeker.dice.com/olc/thread.jspa?threadID=13427&tstart=0
Just wanted you all to know.
Here's a word of caution for you. Anti-H1Bs are slicing and dicing this very conversation and presenting it as a scam.
Please make sure while opening/answering these threads that you do not inadvertently reflect on IV as supporting illegal actions.
http://seeker.dice.com/olc/thread.jspa?threadID=13427&tstart=0
Just wanted you all to know.
hot Expo 2011: #39;Shark Tank#39;
Blog Feeds
01-21 09:50 AM
The National Foundation for American Policy has released a policy brief regarding the new GAO report on the H-1B program and notes that the GAO blows a torpedo through the common complaint that the H-1B program is just a way to bring in cheap guest workers. NFAP GAO H-1B report
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2011/01/nfap-gao-report-confirms-h-1b-workers-paid-as-much-as-comparable-americans.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2011/01/nfap-gao-report-confirms-h-1b-workers-paid-as-much-as-comparable-americans.html)
more...
house Shark Tank Season 2 Episode 8
mchatrvd
09-16 05:41 PM
Everyone
I have couple of questions regarding AC21 process.
1. AC21 does not have any tracking number. Then what does USCIS does with the AC21 package? Is it placed under a separate heap of AC21 files?
2. Does IO ever comes to know that you have applied an AC21 unless he issues RFE to check on your current employment?
3. The AC21 is never attached to your 485 application, as there is no tracking on AC21, right?
4. If you applied for an AC21 and Io issues RFE for current employment, do you need to send a copy of AC21 at that time to assert that you indeed informed USCIS?
Thanks
I have couple of questions regarding AC21 process.
1. AC21 does not have any tracking number. Then what does USCIS does with the AC21 package? Is it placed under a separate heap of AC21 files?
2. Does IO ever comes to know that you have applied an AC21 unless he issues RFE to check on your current employment?
3. The AC21 is never attached to your 485 application, as there is no tracking on AC21, right?
4. If you applied for an AC21 and Io issues RFE for current employment, do you need to send a copy of AC21 at that time to assert that you indeed informed USCIS?
Thanks
tattoo Shark.Tank.S01E15.PDTV.
Macaca
05-19 07:04 AM
House GOP Uses Procedural Tactic To Frustrate Democratic Majority Motion to Recommit Employed to Delay or Alter Legislation (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/18/AR2007051801697.html?hpid=topnews) By Lyndsey Layton (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/lyndsey+layton/) Washington Post Staff Writer, Saturday, May 19, 2007
House Republicans, fighting to remain relevant in a chamber ruled by Democrats, have increasingly seized on a parliamentary technique to alter or delay nearly a dozen pieces of legislation pushed by the majority this year.
And an election-year promise by Democrats to pay for any new programs they created has made it easier for Republicans to trip them up.
Tensions over the maneuvers reached a boil this week. Republicans used procedural tactics to stall floor debate for four hours Wednesday, and they are threatening to tie up future legislative action.
The stalling tactics prompted Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.) to leave the floor and meet privately in his office with Republican Leader John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) and his whip, Rep. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.). The men emerged with an uneasy detente that they said would last at least until Congress breaks for the Memorial Day recess, but the matter is far from settled.
Since January, GOP leaders have relied on a maneuver known as the "motion to recommit" to stymie Democrats and score political points for Republicans still adjusting to life in the minority.
The motion to recommit allows the minority a chance to amend a bill on the floor or send it back to committee, effectively killing it. In a legislative body in which the party in power controls nearly everything, it is one of the few tools the minority has to effect change.
In the 12 years of Republican control that ended in January, Democrats passed 11 motions to recommit. Republicans have racked up the same number in just five months of this Congress.
Democrats say any comparison is unfair because when Republicans controlled Congress, they directed their members to vote against all Democratic motions to recommit.
Now in the majority and mindful of staying there, Democrats have given no such instruction to their members, allowing them to break with the party if they choose. Many freshmen Democrats from GOP-leaning districts find themselves voting with Republicans as a matter of survival -- a reality Republicans have seized upon.
"Sometimes we offer motions to recommit to improve legislation -- sometimes it's to force Democrats in marginal districts to make tough choices," Boehner said. "Every time the Republicans win, it boosts morale. We're able to show unity, which is good for the overall team. Members feel good about winning on the House floor. And when you're in the minority, it doesn't happen that often."
Democrats dismiss the Republican maneuvers as largely symbolic and so arcane as to be irrelevant to the public.
"From a public policy standpoint, it's not very significant," said Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), regarded as an expert in parliamentary combat. "It's almost a Capture the Flag game. The number of people in America who say, 'Oh my gosh, the Republicans won another motion to recommit' is very small."
But Republicans argue they have been able to make significant changes. They point to Thursday, when they successfully used a motion to recommit to restore millions of dollars for missile defense to a defense bill. It remains to be seen if that money will survive a conference committee.
"It's kind of a 'Rashomon' world," said Thomas Mann, a congressional scholar at the Brookings Institution, referring to the movie in which participants in an event all recount it differently. "The two parties see it in very different terms."
The Democrats' own rules have made it easier for Republicans to offer motions to recommit. In January, the party promised to observe "pay-go" -- finding a way to pay for any new spending rather than adding to the federal deficit. The unintended consequence is that tax proposals open legislation to modifications by the minority that would not otherwise be allowed.
Such was the case in March, when Democrats tried to pass a bill to give the District of Columbia a vote in the House. The bill included an additional seat for Utah and a minuscule tax increase to pay for two more House seats -- it called for expanding a provision of federal tax withholding law by .003 percent.
Republicans seized on the opening and moved to recommit the bill to committee, attaching new language that would have thrown out the District's strict anti-gun laws.
Worried that conservative, pro-gun Democrats would feel compelled to vote with GOP and kill the bill, Democratic leaders yanked it from the floor. They regrouped and split the bill into two tightly written measures, both of which passed and are pending in the Senate.
But the problem for Democrats was apparent. "We need to address that, or we're going to be, on every bill . . . [facing] an amendment totally unrelated to the substance of the bill," Hoyer said at the time.
This week, Democratic staffers privately discussed a rule change to limit the Republicans' ability to make motions to recommit. GOP leaders were incensed and threatened to use all available procedural techniques to block every bill except war spending legislation. But Democrats are hampered by their promise to run the chamber in a more open fashion than Republicans did when in the majority.
Hoyer agreed to hold off on further rule changes until Memorial Day and consult Boehner and Blunt on possible changes.
"The bottom line is, the war goes on," Mann said. "The majority uses the rules to structure debates and limit amendments on matters where Republicans have a chance to either break up the Democrats' winning coalition or embarrass them."
House Republicans, fighting to remain relevant in a chamber ruled by Democrats, have increasingly seized on a parliamentary technique to alter or delay nearly a dozen pieces of legislation pushed by the majority this year.
And an election-year promise by Democrats to pay for any new programs they created has made it easier for Republicans to trip them up.
Tensions over the maneuvers reached a boil this week. Republicans used procedural tactics to stall floor debate for four hours Wednesday, and they are threatening to tie up future legislative action.
The stalling tactics prompted Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.) to leave the floor and meet privately in his office with Republican Leader John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) and his whip, Rep. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.). The men emerged with an uneasy detente that they said would last at least until Congress breaks for the Memorial Day recess, but the matter is far from settled.
Since January, GOP leaders have relied on a maneuver known as the "motion to recommit" to stymie Democrats and score political points for Republicans still adjusting to life in the minority.
The motion to recommit allows the minority a chance to amend a bill on the floor or send it back to committee, effectively killing it. In a legislative body in which the party in power controls nearly everything, it is one of the few tools the minority has to effect change.
In the 12 years of Republican control that ended in January, Democrats passed 11 motions to recommit. Republicans have racked up the same number in just five months of this Congress.
Democrats say any comparison is unfair because when Republicans controlled Congress, they directed their members to vote against all Democratic motions to recommit.
Now in the majority and mindful of staying there, Democrats have given no such instruction to their members, allowing them to break with the party if they choose. Many freshmen Democrats from GOP-leaning districts find themselves voting with Republicans as a matter of survival -- a reality Republicans have seized upon.
"Sometimes we offer motions to recommit to improve legislation -- sometimes it's to force Democrats in marginal districts to make tough choices," Boehner said. "Every time the Republicans win, it boosts morale. We're able to show unity, which is good for the overall team. Members feel good about winning on the House floor. And when you're in the minority, it doesn't happen that often."
Democrats dismiss the Republican maneuvers as largely symbolic and so arcane as to be irrelevant to the public.
"From a public policy standpoint, it's not very significant," said Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), regarded as an expert in parliamentary combat. "It's almost a Capture the Flag game. The number of people in America who say, 'Oh my gosh, the Republicans won another motion to recommit' is very small."
But Republicans argue they have been able to make significant changes. They point to Thursday, when they successfully used a motion to recommit to restore millions of dollars for missile defense to a defense bill. It remains to be seen if that money will survive a conference committee.
"It's kind of a 'Rashomon' world," said Thomas Mann, a congressional scholar at the Brookings Institution, referring to the movie in which participants in an event all recount it differently. "The two parties see it in very different terms."
The Democrats' own rules have made it easier for Republicans to offer motions to recommit. In January, the party promised to observe "pay-go" -- finding a way to pay for any new spending rather than adding to the federal deficit. The unintended consequence is that tax proposals open legislation to modifications by the minority that would not otherwise be allowed.
Such was the case in March, when Democrats tried to pass a bill to give the District of Columbia a vote in the House. The bill included an additional seat for Utah and a minuscule tax increase to pay for two more House seats -- it called for expanding a provision of federal tax withholding law by .003 percent.
Republicans seized on the opening and moved to recommit the bill to committee, attaching new language that would have thrown out the District's strict anti-gun laws.
Worried that conservative, pro-gun Democrats would feel compelled to vote with GOP and kill the bill, Democratic leaders yanked it from the floor. They regrouped and split the bill into two tightly written measures, both of which passed and are pending in the Senate.
But the problem for Democrats was apparent. "We need to address that, or we're going to be, on every bill . . . [facing] an amendment totally unrelated to the substance of the bill," Hoyer said at the time.
This week, Democratic staffers privately discussed a rule change to limit the Republicans' ability to make motions to recommit. GOP leaders were incensed and threatened to use all available procedural techniques to block every bill except war spending legislation. But Democrats are hampered by their promise to run the chamber in a more open fashion than Republicans did when in the majority.
Hoyer agreed to hold off on further rule changes until Memorial Day and consult Boehner and Blunt on possible changes.
"The bottom line is, the war goes on," Mann said. "The majority uses the rules to structure debates and limit amendments on matters where Republicans have a chance to either break up the Democrats' winning coalition or embarrass them."
more...
pictures MSRON-1 and 11 are taking part in the month-long exercise Shark Tank 2011,
friend99
01-15 05:19 PM
Hi,
I have got my EAD and want to do part time job as well as work on H1 for the employee who sponsored my GC, What is my status? I am still on H1 or AOS? I would be glad if someone can reply!
I have got my EAD and want to do part time job as well as work on H1 for the employee who sponsored my GC, What is my status? I am still on H1 or AOS? I would be glad if someone can reply!
dresses ABC#39;s “Shark Tank,” the
grimreaper
01-17 10:35 AM
Just came across GAO's( General Accountability Office) recommendations to make changes in H-1B program. Eventhough they talk mainly about Staffing Companies and increased employer accountability, there seems to be a mention regarding the H1B extensions beyond 6 years with simultaneous application to green card. Eventhough not stating in exact words, it seems to hint to the congress to seriously relook at H-1B extensions beyond 6years and also regarding cap exempt Visas and supposedly how easy it is to get them. Looks like with the economy being how it is, Congress might use this report to jump in and bring some unfavourable changes. Any thoughts on this...?
Here is the link to the report:
http://www.gao.gov/highlights/d1126high.pdf
Here is the link to the report:
http://www.gao.gov/highlights/d1126high.pdf
more...
makeup Shark Tank
freddyCR
August 12th, 2005, 03:51 AM
1234http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a103/freddyphoto/MISC/IMG_6516-1BW.jpg
girlfriend period in a shark tank.
Inform12
06-08 02:41 PM
was here in the US in B2 visa. I applied for change of status (to F-1) and after waiting for several months, they told me that my request has been denied. What are the options that I have if I still want to stay in the US
hairstyles 2011 CVCC Shark Tank Event was
GCVictim
02-18 02:37 PM
Hi,
My friend has approved H1B with his previous employer and visa was stamped in 2006 in India. Visa is valid till end of 2009. He never came to US and he does not work for the employer(like Wipro) anymore in India.
Now he wants to come to US with new employer. What are the choices? As I know to transfer H1B to new employer he should be in US and with other documents like paystubs, SSN, etc.
I appreciate your response.
Thanks,
My friend has approved H1B with his previous employer and visa was stamped in 2006 in India. Visa is valid till end of 2009. He never came to US and he does not work for the employer(like Wipro) anymore in India.
Now he wants to come to US with new employer. What are the choices? As I know to transfer H1B to new employer he should be in US and with other documents like paystubs, SSN, etc.
I appreciate your response.
Thanks,
immivoice123
01-12 10:54 AM
technically you r eligible for 3 years
santa123
09-11 10:38 PM
Looks like everyone is trying various tricks:mad:
No comments:
Post a Comment